Crusaders with Agendas are Not Bound by Truth

by

I came across this sentence some time ago and liked how powerful it was. Succinct.

The original meaning behind the Crusades has strong religious connotations and can be interpreted as either oppressive or noble in intent. I’m using Crusaders to mean anyone or any group with a single, obsessive focus.

In my life, I don’t see most absolutes as true all the time. This title falls into that category. That being said, or written in this case, let’s see how this Blog title impacts my decision-making.

In the political world, there are groups that are single-minded. Their existence is to push a simple agenda. The separatist party in Quebec is an example of this. All their policies are filtered through their lens of consideration to assess how they will impact their single agenda of separation. Anything that does not support their goal is discarded or massaged beyond recognition into worthlessness.

Trying to have a discussion of ideas with Crusaders is usually a waste of time. Members of the group have made up their minds, and the possibility of change on my part, or on the Crusader’s, is unlikely.

During an election or referendum campaign, the Crusader becomes even more narrowly focused, not open to ideas that will have a negative effect on the vote.

Many not-for-profit groups are led by incredible volunteers who devote countless hours to helping others. When volunteers believe in the group’s purpose and actions, the process tends to work out to most members’ satisfaction. Occasionally, a member concludes that the group is not doing the right thing to achieve its goals. For example, a member may feel strongly that political action is needed, such as picketing by the main roads to make their needs known. Others prefer a lower-key approach and suggest inviting their government officials to attend a meeting to discuss issues.

A small number of group members can easily take over the power structure of small not-for-profits. Sometimes they achieve great things, but often they wither on the vine without quickly achieving their vision for the group.

A motto of never letting the truth get in the way of progress is ultimately a path grounded on quicksand. “The end justifies the means” is a common expression used to dismiss objections to ideas.

I try not to engage in conversations with Crusaders. For what purpose? My time is better spent elsewhere. I will listen to what they have to say, which can often be summarized in 100 words or fewer. This has saved me countless useless hours I would never get back. Then I move on.

When I hear someone use one or more absolute terms, such as always, never, everybody, and no one, I usually mentally leave the building.

Please give this a bit of a think. Have there been times when you have been a Crusader? Have there been times when you’ve been in the company of Crusaders with whom you disagree about their cause?

Please comment: Send me an email with your bit of a think. I am curious about your thoughts.

Photo AI created with the following request: “Create an image that shows ancient Crusaders holding a piece of paper with a visible title AGENDA,” with a follow-up request, “Can you redo the Crusader image, showing the paper titled AGENDA with only 1 item listed?”

If you enjoyed The Blog, please share it with others. Thanks.

And my thanks to St. Albert’s 50+ Activity Centre for making this Blog possible.

Volunteer Blogger

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Chat with S.A.S.A. Virtual Assistant
💬
BETA: Chat with S.A.S.A. Virtual Assistant ×